WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.132
As we swiftly approach the end of&nbsp;November...

00:00:04.612 --> 00:00:07.611
oh, as December draws so near, it's here,

00:00:07.611 --> 00:00:09.668
the holiday season is upon us.

00:00:09.668 --> 00:00:16.026
And,&nbsp;as is tradition, many people will be stringing colorful electric lights all every which&nbsp;way.

00:00:16.026 --> 00:00:17.537
Because why not?

00:00:17.537 --> 00:00:23.264
And, as is tradition, 
this person makes a video about the awful&nbsp;state of Christmas lights

00:00:23.264 --> 00:00:27.752
brought about by scientists 
who were so preoccupied with whether&nbsp;they could,

00:00:27.752 --> 00:00:30.915
they never stopped to think if they should.

00:00:30.915 --> 00:00:35.615
But before I launch into the tirade&nbsp;
I've launched into half a dozen times now,

00:00:35.615 --> 00:00:41.020
here's an actual Christmas light storage&nbsp;tip I learned from a teacher in high school.

00:00:41.020 --> 00:00:44.236
When it comes time to put the Christmas lights&nbsp;away for the season,

00:00:44.236 --> 00:00:46.562
don't use the tried and true

00:00:46.562 --> 00:00:51.261
"wrap them around your arm like an extension cord&nbsp;and then shove it all into a Jewel bag" method my dad taught me

00:00:51.261 --> 00:00:53.246
because that's bad.

00:00:53.246 --> 00:00:57.565
Sorry, Dad, they&nbsp;just get way too tangled up and tend to break.

00:00:57.565 --> 00:01:05.203
Instead, take a rectangular piece of cardboard&nbsp;
and cut a slit into its side near the end of its long edge.

00:01:05.203 --> 00:01:08.461
Cut at least two slits with one on each&nbsp;
end.

00:01:08.461 --> 00:01:10.944
Then, and this is very important,

00:01:10.944 --> 00:01:17.662
start with the female end of a strand of 
Christmas lights&nbsp;and shove the wire down that slit.

00:01:17.662 --> 00:01:24.290
Now, simply wrap the lights repeatedly around the cardboard&nbsp;until you're back to the male end, like so.

00:01:26.264 --> 00:01:33.094
[a very high-pitched rendition of Entry of the Gladiators]

00:01:37.389 --> 00:01:38.098
Okay,

00:01:38.098 --> 00:01:43.069
now you can either stick the male end&nbsp;
into the female end if there's enough room or

00:01:43.280 --> 00:01:48.822
simply slide it into the other slot and you'll&nbsp;
have a nice and compact flat thing

00:01:48.822 --> 00:01:51.548
with all your Christmas lights on them.

00:01:51.548 --> 00:01:59.392
If you do it&nbsp;this way, you will discover that they stack nicely into boxes while remaining completely&nbsp;tangle-free.

00:01:59.392 --> 00:02:03.763
And so long as you remember 
to start wrapping with the female end,

00:02:03.763 --> 00:02:10.267
they function&nbsp;as a decent spool 
when it comes time to decorate next year.

00:02:10.267 --> 00:02:15.046
I am a full-on convert to this method&nbsp;
of storing Christmas lights and wish to spread the knowledge.

00:02:15.046 --> 00:02:15.961
So there you go!

00:02:15.961 --> 00:02:19.710
And now back&nbsp;to my regularly scheduled tirade.

00:02:19.710 --> 00:02:26.147
You see, I am old enough to predate 
the commercialization&nbsp;of LED lighting technology.

00:02:26.147 --> 00:02:31.367
When I was a youngin', we were still mostly shoving electricity&nbsp;through tiny tungsten filaments

00:02:31.367 --> 00:02:38.169
which caused those filaments to get incredibly hot such that&nbsp;they glow with a bright white light.

00:02:38.169 --> 00:02:40.425
That's just how light bulbs worked.

00:02:40.425 --> 00:02:45.257
And since the underlying&nbsp;technology 
produced a full spectrum white light output,

00:02:45.257 --> 00:02:50.477
if we wanted to produce colored light,&nbsp;we'd need to use filters

00:02:50.477 --> 00:02:55.669
which removed certain 
frequencies of light and only let some through.

00:02:55.669 --> 00:02:57.981
This had two inevitable side effects:

00:02:57.981 --> 00:03:00.618
One, the filtering wasn't perfect,

00:03:00.618 --> 00:03:07.116
so the colors&nbsp;produced, while often quite 
intense and beautiful, weren't unnaturally pure.

00:03:07.116 --> 00:03:11.856
It does not look, for&nbsp;lack of a better word, electronic.

00:03:11.856 --> 00:03:17.885
Secondly, this filtering from a wide 
spectrum of light to a small&nbsp;sliver of that spectrum

00:03:17.885 --> 00:03:20.863
reduces how much light escapes the bulb,

00:03:20.863 --> 00:03:25.348
causing those colored lights&nbsp;
to be much darker than their clear counterparts,

00:03:25.348 --> 00:03:31.373
particularly the cooler colors on the 
shorter end&nbsp;of the spectrum, such as blue and green.

00:03:31.373 --> 00:03:35.450
Now, I am fully familiar with that 
Douglas Adams quotation&nbsp;which says,

00:03:35.450 --> 00:03:41.415
"Anything that is in the world when you're born is normal and ordinary and is just&nbsp;a natural part of the way the world works."

00:03:41.415 --> 00:03:46.173
And while I'm sure there's some 
wisdom there relevant&nbsp;to my whole deal,

00:03:46.173 --> 00:03:53.821
the part that follows about stuff which hit the scene in your teenage to early&nbsp;adult years being new and exciting

00:03:53.821 --> 00:03:56.365
only sort of applies to me.

00:03:56.365 --> 00:04:02.422
Because you see, while I absolutely&nbsp;love what the light emitting diode has done to make the world better,

00:04:02.422 --> 00:04:06.831
it has made Christmas&nbsp;much, much worse.

00:04:06.831 --> 00:04:10.794
Now, instead of decorating with 
warm and pleasant festive lighting,

00:04:10.794 --> 00:04:20.040
we&nbsp;are decorating with horrid points of flickering 
saturated colors that belong in a gaming PC.

00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:22.643
And not even, like, a good one.

00:04:22.643 --> 00:04:24.243
Why is this?

00:04:24.320 --> 00:04:30.099
Well, because LEDs are actually only capable&nbsp;
of emitting light of a single wavelength.

00:04:30.099 --> 00:04:34.132
This means they produce a single and very pure color.

00:04:35.225 --> 00:04:39.785
Now, when it comes to 
white LEDs, there's some trickery involved.

00:04:39.785 --> 00:04:46.817
Every modern white LED you'll&nbsp;ever see is actually 
a hybrid between an LED and, believe it or not,

00:04:46.817 --> 00:04:49.633
good old fluorescent lighting&nbsp;technology.

00:04:49.633 --> 00:04:56.997
The actual diodes produce blue (or as is increasingly common these days) a purplish near-UV light.

00:04:56.997 --> 00:05:03.311
So to fill in the rest of the spectrum, 
a yellow dab of various phosphors sits in front of&nbsp;the diode

00:05:03.311 --> 00:05:08.875
and converts the high frequency light 
it produces down to various lower frequencies

00:05:08.875 --> 00:05:15.333
which&nbsp;cluster together well enough 
to trick our eyes and brains into thinking it's actually white.

00:05:15.333 --> 00:05:18.000
We've&nbsp;gotten incredibly good at this.

00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:22.611
While cheap and nasty LEDs 
are still on the market in the bargain&nbsp;bin,

00:05:22.611 --> 00:05:29.256
any decent LED fab these days is 
capable of producing incredibly good white LEDs

00:05:29.256 --> 00:05:34.153
that produce&nbsp;light which is 
nearly indistinguishable from an incandescent filament.

00:05:34.153 --> 00:05:40.502
And of course, we're&nbsp;now able to embed 
the actual blue or purple diodes onto a substrate in such a way

00:05:40.502 --> 00:05:45.042
that we can&nbsp;make 
very convincing mimics of incandescent light bulbs.

00:05:45.042 --> 00:05:49.151
This is all innovation I'm 100% on&nbsp;board with!

00:05:49.151 --> 00:05:55.773
And when people care, we can even do stuff like combine diodes of different color&nbsp;temperatures into a single product

00:05:55.773 --> 00:05:59.704
for producing a fixture or bulb 
with a selectable color&nbsp;temperature.

00:05:59.704 --> 00:06:02.152
Or, as is my favorite application,

00:06:02.152 --> 00:06:07.351
automatically shifting the color temperature 
down&nbsp;as light intensity decreases

00:06:07.351 --> 00:06:11.900
to mimic the warming effect 
of an incandescent bulb on a dimmer switch.

00:06:11.900 --> 00:06:14.843
You can build that directly into a light bulb

00:06:14.843 --> 00:06:19.701
which means you can use old-fashioned 
dimmer&nbsp;switches to control new fangled light bulbs,

00:06:19.701 --> 00:06:21.761
and you don't even need an app!

00:06:21.761 --> 00:06:25.655
Philips used to&nbsp;shove that tech 
into pretty much every kind of light bulb they sold,

00:06:25.655 --> 00:06:30.965
but not enough people&nbsp;seem to notice how good 
of an idea that was, and now it's annoyingly hard to find.

00:06:30.965 --> 00:06:33.743
Even&nbsp;their own website filter doesn't work.

00:06:33.743 --> 00:06:37.332
You people need to start caring about lighting more&nbsp;than you do!

00:06:37.332 --> 00:06:41.190
I'll rant more about that later, but back to Christmas lights.

00:06:41.190 --> 00:06:46.897
While we have had&nbsp;the capability 
to produce extremely good white LEDs for a long time

00:06:46.897 --> 00:06:54.911
and while the market clearly&nbsp;understands that there are lots of people who want the energy efficiency and long life benefits of&nbsp;LEDs

00:06:54.911 --> 00:06:59.535
but who also want to have the aesthetics 
of old hot-glowing-wire light bulbs...

00:06:59.535 --> 00:07:03.297
that memo&nbsp;just never gets received 
by Christmas light manufacturers!

00:07:03.297 --> 00:07:09.850
Because year after year they end&nbsp;up putting Christmas lights on the market which look like these old ones.

00:07:09.850 --> 00:07:14.096
Now, instead of taking&nbsp;a 
white light and filtering it down to various colors,

00:07:14.096 --> 00:07:19.253
each light produces its own wavelength, 
which leads not only to oversaturated colors

00:07:19.253 --> 00:07:24.158
but especially in the case of multicolored 
light&nbsp;sets like this, which have blues and greens,

00:07:24.158 --> 00:07:31.154
overly bright colors which overwhelm the rest&nbsp;
and result in a garish blue-green color palette, which,

00:07:31.647 --> 00:07:37.783
while admittedly a matter of taste, 
I find&nbsp;to be the exact opposite of warm and inviting.

00:07:37.783 --> 00:07:43.060
It's Christmastime, not the Enchantment Under the&nbsp;Sea Dance.

00:07:43.060 --> 00:07:48.943
Now, the really frustrating thing here 
is that the solution to this problem is obvious!

00:07:48.943 --> 00:07:58.218
Do what everyone already does with regular old light bulbs and make old-fashioned looking things&nbsp;using modern technology.

00:07:58.218 --> 00:08:03.674
Produce Christmas lights with warm white diodes 
that then have a color&nbsp;filter over them

00:08:03.674 --> 00:08:07.597
like we used to have to do with incandescent lights.

00:08:07.597 --> 00:08:13.759
For years, I was making&nbsp;YouTube videos where I would buy cheap warm white LED sets of Christmas lights

00:08:13.759 --> 00:08:17.934
and color them by&nbsp;hand 
with various materials to demonstrate that

00:08:17.934 --> 00:08:22.597
A) this could be done and 
2) it works reasonably&nbsp;well.

00:08:22.597 --> 00:08:26.303
I was never completely happy 
with any of my various experiments,

00:08:26.303 --> 00:08:34.012
but this was just a silly&nbsp;thing I did every year to hopefully prove a point and inspire someone with an R&amp;D budget to take&nbsp;action.

00:08:34.012 --> 00:08:37.797
And as many of you know, this is finally starting to happen.

00:08:37.797 --> 00:08:45.262
A few years ago, I learned&nbsp;about Tru-Tone bulbs, the passion project of a designer who had the exact same bugbear as me,

00:08:45.262 --> 00:08:48.715
but who actually bothered to do something about it.

00:08:48.715 --> 00:08:53.079
True Tone started out 
making LED C7 and C9&nbsp;light bulbs

00:08:53.079 --> 00:08:57.416
which actually looked
 exactly like the incandescent bulbs they replaced.

00:08:57.416 --> 00:09:01.457
And they are&nbsp;truly great products 
which I can personally vouch for.

00:09:01.457 --> 00:09:03.185
I love them.

00:09:03.185 --> 00:09:07.060
But they weren't making mini&nbsp;lights... yet,

00:09:07.060 --> 00:09:11.157
so I just kept making the same video year after year.

00:09:11.157 --> 00:09:15.390
Then last year, my friend Dan&nbsp;
let me know about Vintaglow lights,

00:09:15.390 --> 00:09:19.769
and these were almost perfectly argeted at me specifically.

00:09:19.769 --> 00:09:23.585
This&nbsp;is my preferred color combo 
of red, yellow, green, and blue,

00:09:23.585 --> 00:09:28.386
and they executed the idea much better&nbsp;than any of my experiments could.

00:09:28.386 --> 00:09:34.164
I did have a few nitpicks, but well...

00:09:34.164 --> 00:09:35.918
those have all been taken&nbsp;care of.

00:09:35.918 --> 00:09:39.544
This is a set of generation 2 Vintaglows,

00:09:39.544 --> 00:09:46.132
and they are a near spot-on perfect match 
to the&nbsp;incandescent light sets of my youth.

00:09:46.132 --> 00:09:52.624
Also of note, for those of you who would prefer the more&nbsp;
traditional five color combo, that's now an option.

00:09:52.624 --> 00:10:00.868
Now, I do want to point out that in a dozen&nbsp;sets of my Gen 1 Vintaglows, I did find one where a strand lost a section.

00:10:00.868 --> 00:10:06.190
I'm sure it's&nbsp;fixable, and each set included some spare bulbs, 
but it's probably going to be annoying to fix,

00:10:06.190 --> 00:10:08.381
and I haven't gotten around to it right yet.

00:10:08.381 --> 00:10:11.691
I might do that for Connextras but it'll be a couple&nbsp;of weeks.

00:10:11.691 --> 00:10:15.631
But since so many of you know 
about my Christmas light opinions,

00:10:15.631 --> 00:10:19.503
I tend to be alerted&nbsp;to the existence 
of new options on the market.

00:10:19.503 --> 00:10:23.445
And this year there were 
a couple of developments&nbsp;worth sharing.

00:10:23.445 --> 00:10:32.182
This puts me in a bit of an odd spot because I very much want Tru-Tone and&nbsp;the Vintaglow line from Merry Co to succeed as businesses.

00:10:32.182 --> 00:10:36.186
But both of them are carving out&nbsp;a very specific niche

00:10:36.186 --> 00:10:44.650
and that makes their products relatively unattainable both from a cost&nbsp;perspective and simply where to get your hands on them.

00:10:44.650 --> 00:10:52.934
I've had correspondence with both founders&nbsp;now and have learned some very interesting things about the Christmas light industry.

00:10:52.934 --> 00:11:00.616
It's clear&nbsp;that the actual creative direction which is producing these better lights is coming from them.

00:11:00.616 --> 00:11:08.223
The biggest problem with Christmas lights today is that nobody at the big box stores who is in&nbsp;charge of ordering them for the year

00:11:08.223 --> 00:11:17.076
really cares that much and simply takes whatever options&nbsp;the overseas factories that barf them out present to them that year.

00:11:17.076 --> 00:11:21.298
But Tru-Tone and Merry Co are&nbsp;quite a lot more persnickety,

00:11:21.298 --> 00:11:28.813
so I want to make sure they get the credit for sparking much of what has&nbsp;happened and I'm sure will happen in the future.

00:11:28.880 --> 00:11:32.672
But I also get the sense that both of them will&nbsp;
feel a sense of accomplishment

00:11:32.672 --> 00:11:39.334
if the broader Christmas light market gets a little less...
intense&nbsp;and a little more warm and festive. \So with that,&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:11:39.334 --> 00:11:43.127
So with that, let's look at this copycat.

00:11:43.127 --> 00:11:48.376
I was a little&nbsp;too late, as you might have been able to tell, 
getting this video started so I had to drive to a

00:11:48.376 --> 00:11:55.007
pretty far away Target to get these and the only option 
were these net lights rather than simple&nbsp;strings.

00:11:55.007 --> 00:12:01.768
But there now exists a Sylvania-branded 
"Traditional Glow" set of Christmas lights which&nbsp;are...

00:12:01.768 --> 00:12:03.308
pretty good!

00:12:03.308 --> 00:12:05.802
These appear to actually be made of glass,

00:12:05.802 --> 00:12:13.779
so this is pretty much the best way to&nbsp;create traditional looking mini-lights with LEDs rather than filaments.

00:12:13.779 --> 00:12:16.408
But the green...

00:12:16.408 --> 00:12:18.010
the green's&nbsp;not great.

00:12:18.010 --> 00:12:24.568
It's more like a jade or forest green 
than the emerald green I'm used to in Christmas&nbsp;lights.

00:12:24.568 --> 00:12:28.893
Honestly though, that's really the only problematic color.

00:12:28.893 --> 00:12:33.310
This is not my favorite color&nbsp;combo, 
in fact, it's my least favorite,

00:12:33.310 --> 00:12:38.192
but it's a very standard one 
and I think most people buying&nbsp;these will be happy.

00:12:38.192 --> 00:12:45.409
And it's a good sign that these are sold out already while there are plenty&nbsp;of other options still available in the store.

00:12:45.409 --> 00:12:51.954
So perhaps signals will get to the appropriate people&nbsp;
in charge of ordering Christmas lights for next year.

00:12:51.954 --> 00:12:58.813
And speaking of sold out copycats, I was&nbsp;also alerted to this vintage option for sale at the Home Depot this year,

00:12:58.813 --> 00:13:05.376
which is, as far as I&nbsp;know, 
the first copycat of Tru-Tone's Jewel Tone lights.

00:13:05.376 --> 00:13:07.622
Now, this is as good a look as you're&nbsp;going to get.

00:13:07.622 --> 00:13:13.352
I would have absolutely bought a set to compare them, 
but again, they were sold&nbsp;out throughout my area.

00:13:13.352 --> 00:13:16.189
Which I will take as a very good sign.

00:13:16.189 --> 00:13:22.249
People know this looks better,&nbsp;
but haven't been able to get them until quite recently.

00:13:22.249 --> 00:13:30.735
But while these are at least getting the&nbsp;concept correct, the quality of the color coating doesn't look that great.

00:13:30.735 --> 00:13:33.014
The blue is extremely&nbsp;faded.

00:13:33.014 --> 00:13:36.000
That might as well be a cool white.

00:13:36.000 --> 00:13:41.276
Now, it's possible that it was a darker blue 
when this&nbsp;display was first switched on,

00:13:41.276 --> 00:13:48.278
but if the color was able to fade 
that much in an indoor display,&nbsp;that doesn't bode well.

00:13:48.278 --> 00:13:55.356
For comparison, this set of Tru-Tone Jewel Tone lights 
was outdoors for&nbsp;two seasons, and they still look great.

00:13:55.356 --> 00:13:59.112
And now, a small diversion on nomenclature.

00:13:59.112 --> 00:14:05.777
Of course I&nbsp;checked out my mostly Midwestern mega merchandise mecca, Menards, to see what they might have in&nbsp;store.

00:14:05.777 --> 00:14:11.419
And I have one positive thing to say, 
along with several very negative things to say.

00:14:11.419 --> 00:14:13.043
I got excited by the packaging,

00:14:13.120 --> 00:14:18.928
which had been revised for 2025 and which was&nbsp;
touting "classic incandescent glow,"

00:14:18.928 --> 00:14:21.624
but that was just pure lies.

00:14:21.624 --> 00:14:27.874
This is the same product I got&nbsp;my hands on last year, though I can't remember if there was a twinkling option or not.

00:14:27.874 --> 00:14:34.874
I checked&nbsp;the steady version and it had identical colors and their clear colored C7s and C9s are just as&nbsp;horrendous as before.

00:14:34.874 --> 00:14:41.615
So, whoever your supplier is isn't getting the memo.

00:14:41.615 --> 00:14:44.575
Or else you haven't&nbsp;figured out how to write that memo yet.

00:14:44.575 --> 00:14:47.567
So, what's my positive thing to say?

00:14:47.567 --> 00:14:53.211
Well, Menards&nbsp;is rolling out the term 
"vivid" for some of their other multicolor options.

00:14:53.211 --> 00:14:59.343
And I think they might&nbsp;have stumbled upon a great way to distinguish between monochromatic LED Christmas lights

00:14:59.343 --> 00:15:01.654
for&nbsp;you freaks which like that for some reason

00:15:01.654 --> 00:15:06.729
and the more pleasant vintage versions I'm yearning&nbsp;for.

00:15:06.729 --> 00:15:12.121
They need to actually get their vintage line 
to look decent before I can really give them&nbsp;credit.

00:15:12.121 --> 00:15:16.206
But I think vivid versus vintage is a good distinction.

00:15:16.840 --> 00:15:21.590
Though I also think the "traditional&nbsp;glow" works well.

00:15:21.590 --> 00:15:24.896
I'm starting to think a big issue with modern lighting

00:15:24.896 --> 00:15:31.491
is that many people simply&nbsp;don't have 
very broad vocabularies to describe the qualities of light.

00:15:31.491 --> 00:15:36.043
So, while they can describe&nbsp;something 
as looking off or harsh or unpleasant,

00:15:36.043 --> 00:15:39.602
it can be difficult to communicate the specific&nbsp;reasons.

00:15:39.602 --> 00:15:44.325
A simple distinction like 
"vivid" and "vintage" might be just the trick!

00:15:44.325 --> 00:15:48.834
And now, a second&nbsp;diversion on color combinations.

00:15:48.834 --> 00:15:53.645
For this video, I checked out a different 
mostly Midwestern mega&nbsp;merchandise mecca,

00:15:53.645 --> 00:15:54.931
Meijer.

00:15:54.931 --> 00:15:58.790
For those who aren't familiar with Meijer, 
which is probably most of&nbsp;you,

00:15:58.790 --> 00:16:02.931
it's essentially Walmart 
but run out of Michigan by a different family.

00:16:02.931 --> 00:16:09.301
Now, they didn't&nbsp;have anything really notable except they are still selling incandescent twinkling light sets -

00:16:09.301 --> 00:16:12.070
branded&nbsp;as Phillips, oddly enough.

00:16:12.070 --> 00:16:18.637
my first Christmas light video was about these things and I love&nbsp;them a lot, so I was happy to see them for sale.

00:16:18.637 --> 00:16:22.223
And bought some, many more than two of them.

00:16:22.223 --> 00:16:27.903
But then I discovered that the 
Philips-branded multicolored sets for sale at Meijer

00:16:27.903 --> 00:16:32.444
were a&nbsp;color combo 
I haven't seen in the wild since I was a little kid.

00:16:32.444 --> 00:16:36.856
Red, yellow, green, blue, and&nbsp;purple -

00:16:36.856 --> 00:16:39.469
though you might call it magenta.

00:16:39.469 --> 00:16:46.205
This is the color combination of my grandparents' Christmas&nbsp;tree, and it hit me right in the nostalgia.

00:16:46.205 --> 00:16:48.673
And it also made me realize something.

00:16:48.673 --> 00:16:53.554
In the past,&nbsp;I have said I want none of those purples or pinks.

00:16:53.554 --> 00:16:56.090
But that's not strictly true.

00:16:56.090 --> 00:17:03.537
I am actually&nbsp;completely cool with there being a fifth color so long as it's distinct from the rest.

00:17:03.537 --> 00:17:08.655
That's why I&nbsp;don't like these sets with red, orange, and pink.

00:17:08.655 --> 00:17:15.104
Those three colors are simply too similar, and it&nbsp;means you end up with what blurs into an orangey red mess

00:17:15.104 --> 00:17:18.004
with scant pops of blue and green.

00:17:18.004 --> 00:17:23.971
This&nbsp;combo swaps orange 
for a bright yellow, which actually stands out from red.

00:17:23.971 --> 00:17:30.934
And rather than a&nbsp;pink, which is simply a lighter red, 
it has a true magenta between red and blue.

00:17:30.934 --> 00:17:34.090
So, it also stands&nbsp;out as a separate color.

00:17:34.090 --> 00:17:40.843
Here's a comparison between the more intense 
purple here and the paler&nbsp;pink of a more typical set.

00:17:40.843 --> 00:17:45.027
I realize most of what I'm doing here is rationalizing a subjective&nbsp;opinion,

00:17:45.027 --> 00:17:52.486
but I really do think it's important to have very 
distinct colors to make a pleasing&nbsp;combination.

00:17:52.486 --> 00:17:58.065
I like the red, yellow, blue, green combo 
because each color stands apart from the&nbsp;rest.

00:17:58.065 --> 00:18:05.486
But the much more common red, orange, pink, blue, green has three warm colors which all just&nbsp;smear together.

00:18:05.486 --> 00:18:10.687
This five color combo with yellow rather 
than orange and purple rather than pink

00:18:10.687 --> 00:18:15.290
manages to have five colors 
which are all very distinct from one another

00:18:15.290 --> 00:18:18.779
and so the addition&nbsp;of that purple doesn't bother me.

00:18:18.779 --> 00:18:21.248
In fact, I like it!

00:18:21.248 --> 00:18:25.855
And since the multicolored twinkling sets&nbsp;also have that combo,

00:18:25.855 --> 00:18:27.761
well, you know, I bought a bunch.

00:18:27.761 --> 00:18:34.700
I put them in my tree this year, though, 
I&nbsp;will be honest, it might be just a bit much.

00:18:34.700 --> 00:18:41.558
There is a thin line between 
Christmas cheer and tacky,&nbsp;and this is right up against it.

00:18:41.558 --> 00:18:45.282
I'll see how my opinion changes 
once I get the ornaments on there.

00:18:45.282 --> 00:18:51.324
So, there's really not a whole lot more to this video, 
but I want to circle back to Tru-Tone and&nbsp;Vintaglow.

00:18:51.324 --> 00:18:58.845
If you're after the sorts of Christmas lights that I am, 
I would strongly encourage&nbsp;supporting their efforts directly.

00:18:58.845 --> 00:19:04.489
I know the folks at these companies are the reason the&nbsp;situation is starting to improve,

00:19:04.489 --> 00:19:07.515
and they're even more persnickety than I am.

00:19:07.515 --> 00:19:12.217
I've purchased products&nbsp;from both companies 
and have been extremely happy with them.

00:19:12.217 --> 00:19:18.987
Links to their store pages are in the&nbsp;description, 
though my tardiness means a lot of stuff is already sold out.

00:19:18.987 --> 00:19:21.803
I'm not a very good&nbsp;Christmas lights influencer,

00:19:21.803 --> 00:19:30.184
but I am apparently enough of a Christmas lights influencer to get&nbsp;the inside scoop on some new products they have in the pipeline.

00:19:30.184 --> 00:19:37.792
However, once again, I'm in a&nbsp;bit of an awkward spot 
because True Tone and Mary Co are competitors.

00:19:37.792 --> 00:19:39.904
I like what both of them are&nbsp;doing,

00:19:39.904 --> 00:19:47.280
and since Merry Co focuses primarily on mini lights
while Tru-Tone focuses primarily on C7s&nbsp;and C9s,

00:19:47.280 --> 00:19:53.100
I feel like they complement each other quite well
and you will not catch me picking&nbsp;favorites.

00:19:53.100 --> 00:20:00.649
So, I will just say they both have some really cool new stuff coming which I am excited to&nbsp;see.

00:20:00.649 --> 00:20:04.303
And if you've been afflicted with Christmas light issues similar to mine,

00:20:04.303 --> 00:20:09.427
or perhaps even ones&nbsp;I don't have, such as a sensitivity to flicker,

00:20:09.427 --> 00:20:12.150
I think it would be worth signing up for their&nbsp;newsletters.

00:20:12.150 --> 00:20:19.888
They really are the epicenter of good nostalgic Christmas light innovation and are&nbsp;actually getting it done.

00:20:19.888 --> 00:20:23.206
So kudos to everyone at both companies.

00:20:23.206 --> 00:20:29.783
But I will take it as good news&nbsp;that other brands and stores are finally starting to get it.

00:20:29.783 --> 00:20:32.128
Slowly but surely.

00:20:32.128 --> 00:20:36.000
People genuinely want&nbsp;Christmas lights that look like this!

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:42.868
But you have to make it clear that it's something special 
and&nbsp;you have to have it on display and actually lit.

00:20:42.868 --> 00:20:49.236
So many people have sent me hopeful things 
to&nbsp;investigate which turn out to be disappointments.

00:20:49.236 --> 00:20:54.628
You can't just put the word vintage on the&nbsp;
packaging and hope that'll work, Menards.

00:20:54.720 --> 00:21:01.150
People can see what's wrong with modern Christmas&nbsp;lights, 
but they might not have the best words&nbsp;to describe it.

00:21:01.150 --> 00:21:08.552
If some actual effort is put&nbsp;into creating 
a best of both worlds product, people will buy it.

00:21:08.552 --> 00:21:11.167
But it has to be real&nbsp;effort.

00:21:11.167 --> 00:21:16.175
These Sylvania lights are close, 
but there's a good distance to go.

00:21:16.175 --> 00:21:22.750
And their&nbsp;white strands, while solidly above average, 
are still using quite cheap diodes.

00:21:22.750 --> 00:21:26.339
This white is too&nbsp;pink and color rendering is poor.

00:21:26.339 --> 00:21:32.425
Vintaglow proved last year that you can source 
these tiny little&nbsp;diodes with excellent light output.

00:21:32.425 --> 00:21:38.606
Genuinely, their clear mini lights are incredibly good and&nbsp;nearly indistinguishable from incandescent.

00:21:38.606 --> 00:21:44.352
But it takes a lot of work to keep overseas suppliers&nbsp;from cheapening out just a little too much...

00:21:44.352 --> 00:21:48.915
and the big box stores don't seem too inclined to do&nbsp;that work.

00:21:48.915 --> 00:21:51.101
And now I'm going to finish this video up

00:21:51.101 --> 00:21:56.462
with an unscripted section where I talk about&nbsp;some of my other LED-related complaints.

00:21:56.462 --> 00:21:59.902
I've written down a list of things to cover, and here&nbsp;we go:

00:21:59.902 --> 00:22:02.135
We'll start with a call back.

00:22:02.135 --> 00:22:05.885
"You people need to start 
caring about lighting more than you&nbsp;do!"

00:22:05.885 --> 00:22:08.117
I meant two things by that.

00:22:08.117 --> 00:22:13.787
First, we are now in a place where LEDs are so good and so efficient&nbsp;
and so cheap

00:22:13.787 --> 00:22:15.637
(as well as cheap to operate)

00:22:15.637 --> 00:22:20.588
that overlighting your environment is very easy to do.

00:22:20.588 --> 00:22:27.240
One of the reasons I don't like modern 
Christmas light displays is because they're just too bright.

00:22:27.240 --> 00:22:35.240
No lights like this are very bright at all 
because these are bare filaments you are staring directly&nbsp;at.

00:22:35.240 --> 00:22:37.850
This is supposed to be in your line of sight.

00:22:37.850 --> 00:22:43.172
So, the thing you're looking at needs to be very&nbsp;dull. 
Otherwise, it's going to strain your eyes.

00:22:43.172 --> 00:22:48.630
And a lot of modern Christmas 
light installations&nbsp;are horribly bright.

00:22:48.630 --> 00:22:54.174
I got caught off guard by someone who decorated way before Thanksgiving on&nbsp;my drive home and, geez,

00:22:54.174 --> 00:22:56.757
it was like they had a billboard in their front yard.

00:22:56.757 --> 00:22:57.807
That's not good!

00:22:57.807 --> 00:23:00.075
But it's not just Christmas lights.

00:23:00.075 --> 00:23:09.799
One thing that has also happened is I think LEDs have changed&nbsp;standards people have for lighting in a largely bad way.

00:23:09.799 --> 00:23:13.746
I've talked about this before when I&nbsp;
made my video on switched outlets -

00:23:14.169 --> 00:23:20.963
we are now very used to having central 
overhead lighting which is&nbsp;extremely bright.

00:23:20.963 --> 00:23:26.762
And that means a lot of people these days will look at more traditional lighting&nbsp;environments where you have things like

00:23:26.762 --> 00:23:33.185
table lamps and task lighting and 
complain that there's&nbsp;not enough light.

00:23:33.185 --> 00:23:40.213
Whereas what I think is really the case is 
you've gotten used to very cheap and&nbsp;bad lighting.

00:23:40.213 --> 00:23:48.917
I challenge you to figure out the difference between a single overhead saucer light&nbsp;and a bare light bulb hanging on a string.

00:23:48.917 --> 00:23:50.571
It's not actually that different.

00:23:50.571 --> 00:23:53.705
The saucer light is&nbsp;probably a little more aesthetically pleasing,

00:23:53.705 --> 00:24:00.591
but the pattern of light that it shines in the&nbsp;
room is almost identical to a single light socket on the ceiling.

00:24:00.591 --> 00:24:04.024
And I think you would agree&nbsp;that's not good enough.

00:24:04.024 --> 00:24:11.736
But because LEDs are now so bright, you can have enough light to see&nbsp;in the room with a single point of light.

00:24:11.736 --> 00:24:17.124
And, uh, I honestly think people are 
just getting used&nbsp;to that, even though it's bad.

00:24:17.124 --> 00:24:18.965
It's really bad.

00:24:18.965 --> 00:24:25.331
One thing I've seen a lot of people complain about&nbsp;is hotel rooms because hotel rooms generally don't have overhead lighting -

00:24:25.331 --> 00:24:30.581
and they might have a&nbsp;light by the entrance 
to the room and then lamps throughout the room.

00:24:30.581 --> 00:24:33.723
I think that is actually&nbsp;a much more pleasant environment.

00:24:33.723 --> 00:24:40.630
But again, when you're used to having a single overhead light&nbsp;that illuminates the entire room from the center,

00:24:40.630 --> 00:24:41.785
oh well,

00:24:41.785 --> 00:24:44.174
then the room can look underlit.

00:24:44.174 --> 00:24:47.499
But I&nbsp;would challenge you to change your mindset to ask,

00:24:47.499 --> 00:24:50.061
"Well, what actually needs to be lit?"

00:24:50.061 --> 00:24:51.025
Here's a&nbsp;great example:

00:24:51.025 --> 00:24:55.098
I changed the light fixture above my dining room table to this.

00:24:55.098 --> 00:24:59.033
Not only because&nbsp;it's 
mid-century modern in a way that I very much like,

00:24:59.033 --> 00:25:03.909
but these light fixtures only direct&nbsp;light down.

00:25:03.909 --> 00:25:11.821
The previous light fixture had the bulbs able to shine in all directions, which meant&nbsp;the room was very, very bright,

00:25:11.821 --> 00:25:16.387
but it also meant I was 
looking at light bulbs when sitting at the&nbsp;table.

00:25:16.387 --> 00:25:22.223
This fixture, by directing light only down 
at the table, creates a very moody environment.

00:25:22.223 --> 00:25:26.923
There's almost no light 
hitting the walls at all, unless I turn on my accent lights.

00:25:26.923 --> 00:25:33.039
That's the sort&nbsp;of stuff I would really encourage 
more people to be cognizant of and to play with.

00:25:33.039 --> 00:25:36.253
Lighting impacts&nbsp;your environment so much,

00:25:36.253 --> 00:25:46.432
but if all you want is enough light to see, you're probably going to&nbsp;end up with environments that are very harsh and very overlit.

00:25:46.432 --> 00:25:48.541
But continuing on that train&nbsp;of thought,

00:25:48.541 --> 00:25:54.887
there is a weird twist which I think has happened 
as we have made daylight balanced&nbsp;lighting available.

00:25:54.887 --> 00:25:59.212
I no longer get that hung up on people who claim to prefer daylight balanced&nbsp;
lighting -

00:25:59.212 --> 00:26:02.813
I still say "claimed to" because of what I'm about to say -

00:26:02.813 --> 00:26:08.486
But I am increasingly convinced&nbsp;
that the people who prefer daylight lighting

00:26:08.486 --> 00:26:11.629
(in some contexts - I'm not going to say you can't&nbsp;prefer it)

00:26:11.629 --> 00:26:18.352
but I'm increasingly convinced that a lot of that is 
because if you have had an&nbsp;underlit environment before,

00:26:18.352 --> 00:26:25.429
like for example, you lived in a house which had a single boob&nbsp;light in the center with two 60W bulbs in there,

00:26:25.429 --> 00:26:33.254
then the only thing you have experienced with&nbsp;
warmer lighting is badly lit and underlit environments

00:26:33.254 --> 00:26:39.438
and if you swap those warm lights&nbsp;
for daylight balanced light your visual acuity will go up.

00:26:39.438 --> 00:26:45.266
So I think something that has&nbsp;happened 
is there's an some combination of un -

00:26:45.266 --> 00:26:52.023
I don't want to say unawareness but poor&nbsp;awareness of the virtues of task lighting and directed lighting

00:26:52.023 --> 00:26:56.407
and having more sources&nbsp;of lighting 
in your home than just a single overhead light

00:26:56.407 --> 00:27:03.222
and not recognizing that&nbsp;it's not the color temperature 
that makes that environment look underlit,

00:27:03.222 --> 00:27:06.943
it's the fact&nbsp;that there isn't enough light in enough places.

00:27:06.943 --> 00:27:13.105
What I'm trying to say here is that 
LED lighting&nbsp;technology has freed up a lot of new ideas,

00:27:13.105 --> 00:27:18.168
but it has ended up changing our expectations 
in what I&nbsp;would say is a bad way.

00:27:18.168 --> 00:27:22.149
One of the things that we still have is wattage equivalents.

00:27:22.149 --> 00:27:26.933
We still look&nbsp;at light bulbs and say 
that's a 60 watt equivalent or a 100 watt equivalent.

00:27:26.933 --> 00:27:34.108
And that's because it&nbsp;was, in the incandescent days, a fairly consistent amount of light output per watt.

00:27:34.108 --> 00:27:39.251
And now that LEDs&nbsp;have broken way beyond that level of brightness,

00:27:39.251 --> 00:27:45.955
I think it's just quite easy for us to expect&nbsp;
brighter lights in the same location

00:27:45.955 --> 00:27:53.207
rather than expecting more lights spread out to have a more&nbsp;pleasant environment which is more evenly lit.

00:27:53.207 --> 00:27:54.719
I'll just put it like that.

00:27:54.719 --> 00:27:56.796
How am I doing for an&nbsp;unscripted section?

00:27:56.796 --> 00:28:00.865
I'll tell you, I don't think I'm doing pretty great because my next thing is&nbsp;a thing I already talked about.

00:28:00.865 --> 00:28:03.348
But to reiterate I guess

00:28:03.348 --> 00:28:08.430
I really feel like people these days&nbsp;
are less interested in replicating certain kinds of lighting,

00:28:08.463 --> 00:28:12.574
like using additional&nbsp;lamps or directional light.

00:28:12.574 --> 00:28:20.603
And this has resulted in a lot of overlit environments, 
which&nbsp;is changing people's idea of what enough light is.

00:28:20.603 --> 00:28:27.655
One example, there's a house that I drove by that&nbsp;was built in the last couple years and they've got some exterior eaves lighting,

00:28:27.655 --> 00:28:32.550
like uh basically can&nbsp;lights in the eaves and my god,

00:28:32.550 --> 00:28:34.435
they are just way too bright!

00:28:34.435 --> 00:28:39.573
There's way too much light being fired&nbsp;
out of these eaves of this house and it looks horrendous.

00:28:39.573 --> 00:28:41.214
It does not look good.

00:28:41.214 --> 00:28:50.403
But I really&nbsp;think more and more people are just expecting cannons of light now that the LED can do that for&nbsp;us.

00:28:50.403 --> 00:28:52.311
But maybe we shouldn't.

00:28:52.311 --> 00:28:56.205
And for another great example of 
just because you can doesn't mean you&nbsp;should,

00:28:56.205 --> 00:29:03.030
if you haven't already run across these, there are now really convincing LED alternatives&nbsp;to neon tubes.

00:29:03.030 --> 00:29:07.377
And I'm talking like traditional 
neon signs made of bent glass tubes.

00:29:07.377 --> 00:29:09.926
I'm a little&nbsp;sad for what that's doing to the neon industry,

00:29:09.926 --> 00:29:15.195
but it's a lot easier to work with 
and you don't&nbsp;have to deal with blowing glass, etc.

00:29:15.195 --> 00:29:18.955
However, so many of these products, while they look great,

00:29:18.955 --> 00:29:21.106
are way too bright!

00:29:21.106 --> 00:29:26.010
It's as if nobody who makes them 
has ever seen an actual neon sign.

00:29:26.010 --> 00:29:31.502
And&nbsp;the trouble with making it brighter is that, especially when you think of something like a neon&nbsp;sign,

00:29:31.502 --> 00:29:36.590
the contrast is against a dark background, the night sky.

00:29:36.590 --> 00:29:44.219
And if you have something with&nbsp;an ornate shape 
which is being illuminated, if it's too bright, you can't read it.

00:29:44.219 --> 00:29:50.491
There's&nbsp;a lot of new Christmas decorations that are coming out that have that sort of LED neon look to&nbsp;
them.

00:29:50.491 --> 00:29:57.189
And the thing is, they're so freaking bright that if you have them outside, you're never&nbsp;going to be able to tell what that is.

00:29:57.189 --> 00:30:03.540
Like, uh, I've seen a Santa head, which is just going&nbsp;to look like a red and white blob from any reasonable difference*

00:30:03.540 --> 00:30:08.720
They only look correctly&nbsp;
illuminated in already very bright environments.

00:30:09.280 --> 00:30:14.400
So, this is what I mean about the LED is great&nbsp;
because it means we can make really bright lights&nbsp;&nbsp;

00:30:14.400 --> 00:30:18.531
in really small spaces, 
but it's so easy to go&nbsp;overboard.

00:30:18.531 --> 00:30:23.164
And I wish more people were thinking about that as a possibility.

00:30:23.164 --> 00:30:25.996
And for my last&nbsp;LED hot take,

00:30:25.996 --> 00:30:30.358
this is something that is more vibes based than anything else, 
but I wanted&nbsp;to bring it up.

00:30:30.358 --> 00:30:36.676
I truly believe that when you have too much 
freedom in design, this can be&nbsp;a bad thing.

00:30:36.676 --> 00:30:39.565
One of the things that the LED is letting us do now

00:30:39.565 --> 00:30:45.637
is create these incredibly&nbsp;interesting light fixtures and whole new kinds of light fixtures which are very cool.

00:30:45.637 --> 00:30:49.545
But when&nbsp;you have that completely unlimited freedom,

00:30:49.545 --> 00:30:53.882
sometimes you end up making 
a lot of stuff that&nbsp;looks cool but isn't very functional.

00:30:53.882 --> 00:30:59.376
Whereas on the other hand, when we used to have to design&nbsp;around standardized light bulbs,

00:30:59.376 --> 00:31:02.452
that led to a lot of really interesting creations.

00:31:02.452 --> 00:31:11.730
And so in&nbsp;a sense, I am truly bummed by what the LED has done because it's now so cheap, so easy, and so&nbsp;reliable

00:31:11.730 --> 00:31:12.707
(for the most part)

00:31:12.707 --> 00:31:22.677
that we have made some really visually interesting things that just don't&nbsp;actually work that well as light fixtures.

00:31:22.677 --> 00:31:29.848
And uh I've had this thing going on where I feel like&nbsp;a lot of sectors of the economy and industries etc.

00:31:29.848 --> 00:31:32.407
are losing their sense of purpose.

00:31:32.407 --> 00:31:38.629
And I&nbsp;think that the LED is a great example of that where now that we have brighter, faster,&nbsp;cheaper, stronger,

00:31:38.629 --> 00:31:44.906
we just do that rather than thinking about what would actually be a&nbsp;really good application for this technology.

00:31:44.906 --> 00:31:54.713
And thus explains why it's taken 10 years for&nbsp;
someone to do this at a mass market scale.

00:31:56.546 --> 00:31:57.656
Yeah.

00:31:57.656 --> 00:32:00.294
Okay. Well, that's the end.

00:32:00.294 --> 00:32:02.825
I didn't write&nbsp;anything for the outro either,

00:32:02.825 --> 00:32:05.992
so hopefully uh the music is fading pretty well.

00:32:05.992 --> 00:32:10.389
I think we're going&nbsp;to do that jazzy 
We Wish You a Merry Christmas I typically do on these videos.

00:32:10.389 --> 00:32:12.870
And I guess&nbsp;the only thing left to do is to cut the black.

00:32:13.681 --> 00:32:17.674
♫ a jazz version of We Wish You a Merry Christmas ♫

00:32:19.542 --> 00:32:20.248
just like I promised!

00:32:20.741 --> 00:32:23.804
...and string it - shove it more appropriately.

00:32:24.474 --> 00:32:26.638
[laughs]

00:32:26.638 --> 00:32:31.190
...better, so long as you remember to start wrapping&nbsp;at the female end,

00:32:31.190 --> 00:32:35.227
then they become a nice and functional spool...

00:32:35.826 --> 00:32:40.539
And you'll notice on this one,&nbsp;
I did not remember to start at the female end.

00:32:40.539 --> 00:32:43.447
[angry sigh] Or did I?

00:32:43.447 --> 00:32:45.859
No, I did. I just got tangled up.

00:32:45.859 --> 00:32:47.258
Wait, did I?

00:32:48.210 --> 00:32:50.549
No, I did not. Darn it.

00:32:50.549 --> 00:32:58.686
Here, watch watch me do it again because last year me&nbsp;made a boo boo.

00:32:58.686 --> 00:33:01.546
Which is why I am being very...

00:33:02.462 --> 00:33:09.454
...I did - I did this on several of these and that is&nbsp;why I am making sure I point out start with the female end

00:33:09.454 --> 00:33:11.123
or you will regret it.

00:33:11.687 --> 00:33:16.919
They glow with&nbsp;a bright white light.

00:33:16.919 --> 00:33:17.889
That doesn't work

00:33:17.889 --> 00:33:18.389
[laughs]

00:33:18.389 --> 00:33:24.627
which caused those filaments to get so incredibly&nbsp;hot they glew with a bright white light.

00:33:25.261 --> 00:33:25.761
Glew? Heh.

00:33:28.545 --> 00:33:31.184
So here's a fun fact:

00:33:31.184 --> 00:33:34.647
I wrote this end-of-video captions gag in the middle of Kansas.

00:33:34.647 --> 00:33:38.572
Just passed a billboard 
advertising an "Old Fashion (sic) Soda Fountain"

00:33:38.572 --> 00:33:42.870
This isn't what you were expecting for an end-of-video captions gag, huh?

00:33:42.870 --> 00:33:44.341
Well, me neither.

00:33:44.905 --> 00:33:47.859
Merry Christmas!

